IF those unknown people in our dreams are Holographs projections, if not avatar Spirits?

 

Come visit

This question has intrigued me, since I've encountered so many ad hoc cameo characters of graphic substantiveness and those who've been 'frequent flyer' characters in my dreams, though I've never known them before. Are those images of those who have lived or those presently living-if not also from the future? They are more substantial that what was shown in that introductory link. They're more like the persons in action in the link.

From old mentors to secular authority figures, these persons are more than figments or compositions of past synaptic signals. They ARE versions of perspectives as mine is the acknowledging perspective of engaging them.

Do we project our holographic versions of ourselves out into this medium that serves as a nexus point for mental projections. The scenarios are contrived and we assume our conditioned response to the circumstances we find ourselves.  Our tendencies of how we react become self-displayed to us.

I find myself as the functionary confidant to my protagonists. I'm usually the one effectuating the thought [because I have emotional control of my character-observer, though no directional or command effect on the other actors?]. Are these other personages, whether they are one-time ad hoc appearance personalities or frequent flyers: are they from an autonomous source or are they the constraints, inhibitions, or deficiencies of mine acting upon me in avatar representations? Would 'they' be the things that I won't be or dare to be.

Then who are the very solicitous persons? The imagined figment of how I wanted to resonate and communicate. But I said earlier that I have no emotional dream mechanic control or affecting emotional control within the the context of the plot of the dream.

Yet, I do find that it's rare for me being  proactive or initiative-taking in my dreams and, usually just go with the flow of the action, characterizing how I was in my pack-dog ways, Though there were secular times that I was contrarian in my attitude and behavior. Perhaps this is a psychological escape dimension in being the cooperative enabler than the contrarian I feel an imperative to be temporally.