IF those unknown people in our dreams are Holographs projections, if not avatar Spirits?

 

Come visit

This question has intrigued me, since I've encountered so many ad hoc cameo characters of graphic substantiveness and those who've been 'frequent flyer' characters in my dreams, though I've never known them before. Are those images of those who have lived or those presently living-if not also from the future? They are more substantial that what was shown in that introductory link. They're more like the persons in action in the link.

From old mentors to secular authority figures, these persons are more than figments or compositions of past synaptic signals. They ARE versions of perspectives as mine is the acknowledging perspective of engaging them.

Do we project our holographic versions of ourselves out into this medium that serves as a nexus point for mental projections. The scenarios are contrived and we assume our conditioned response to the circumstances we find ourselves.  Our tendencies of how we react become self-displayed to us.

I find myself as the functionary confidant to my protagonists. I'm usually the one effectuating the thought [because I have emotional control of my character-observer, though no directional or command effect on the other actors?]. Are these other personages, whether they are one-time ad hoc appearance personalities or frequent flyers: are they from an autonomous source or are they the constraints, inhibitions, or deficiencies of mine acting upon me in avatar representations? Would 'they' be the things that I won't be or dare to be.

Then who are the very solicitous persons? The imagined figment of how I wanted to resonate and communicate. But I said earlier that I have no emotional dream mechanic control or affecting emotional control within the the context of the plot of the dream.

Yet, I do find that it's rare for me being  proactive or initiative-taking in my dreams and, usually just go with the flow of the action, characterizing how I was in my pack-dog ways, Though there were secular times that I was contrarian in my attitude and behavior. Perhaps this is a psychological escape dimension in being the cooperative enabler than the contrarian I feel an imperative to be temporally.

 

I was presciently thinking about this homily earlier today before reading what I imagine is Patrick Mahones MVP acceptance reflection on his accomplishment.

LIFE IS A FATE LOTTERY. Each era favors certain acts and actors. Much like the random Mutli-Million Do$$ar Lottery winners, they are the more secularly favored 'chosen' for the social-civic skills valued in that era. It's neither a congratulations or a backhanded-shading on what they have done. It's another version of the maxim 'It's 'the Game' you would love or hate, than moralize over the players.

Within the temporal-secular paradigm this is 'the standard' and 'the measure'. I actually believe there's more dimension to existence than that from my anecdotal experiences as a contrarian to what is conventionally recognized as 'the standard' or 'the measure' of the quality of life being lived or lived.

Most-to-all express good intentions and ends and have done or tried to do so what is good for others and themselves. Yet, I THINK that what 'They'/We do is a surrogate for what we've yet to conceive of being, per my anecdotal cognizances of phenomena of my experience.

 It's not much they could do, anyways. I think it's the karma caste role they find themselves by the momentum of the forces of their background and whatever aesthetic intellectual fates have fatefully affected them in this present life.

We do make our own realities, but they can't be absolutely judged by others of our times. There's an emotional resonance and affinity to which we associate most strongly. It not only serves, hopefully, our daily intent but sets the stage of tangible and intangible props which others directly or indirectly experience for their emotional degrees of resonant imperatives.

I'll jump to this conclusion that there's a resonant state to be found in the ala carte choices of sentient affinity for which the temporal tangible and intangible trappings are no more than wardrobe and scene props. They're the metaphorical hand and foot holds by which we join in a literal common-union with an energy of identity selflessness in which we become -at the least-the figurative presence in the past-present-future, as well as the omni-point sensory receptor in those synchronous  synchronicities.