Tuesday, September 12, 2017

Ending the non-reformationist ‘immutable Truth’ of Divine Theology




Ending the non-reformationist ‘immutable Truth’ of Divine Theology
Challenge to Religions of Faith
تحدي أديان الإيمان (الإسلام)

Religious leaders must face and declare the truth that WHO or Whatever is ‘the Omniscient and Omnipotent One’ has the faculties to ‘communicate’ in any mode desired beyond verbal. Animistically speaking the ‘All-Mighty’ can present “ITs-self’ in any symbolism to signal its will. My own encounters and intervention with ITs phenomenology can be traced to:

October 1969 (New Haven, CT)-When I cursed  ‘God’ , the figure of the statue at  East Rock Park was snatched from its illuminated sight on that hill (at the same coincidental moment that the lights were turned off for the day) as a reproach to my comparative impotency to ‘the hand of God’.

(Syracuse NY, 1979-80). I had two dreams. The first was ‘God’ appearing on his throne with his circling cherubims on top of a hill across the street from my ex-Junior High School  westmoreland-harvard.PNG at the moment I was indulging myself with salacious thoughts about some buxom female whose bosoms I wanted to molest. The look of angry reproval on his face as he read how my soul had degraded from my former mystical insights of sacredness, was telling.
The second dream concerned my hearing news reports broadcasts on the TV’s from the houses on the street on which I lived. The reports told of a Fukushima-type earthquake, but even greater in devastation. It had originated off the Japanese coast. It had already engulfed Hawaii and was headed for the US west coast where it was due to submerge California lowlands, leaving the mountains and western Nevada earthquake.PNG as the new southwestern coastline; while disrupting the electrical grid to the Mississippi River. Because I got home just as the main description of the coming calamity was to occur, I went back downtown to the newsstand to get, hopefully, a late edition on what had happened. I was fortunate to get a New York Daily News paper. Instead of the front-page cover picture there was an editorial comment. In summary, the comment made note that at such a time when we humans needed ‘the-hand-of-God’, there seemed to be no person who could be the human’s intercessor to make the case for us: not the Tele-evangelist or other titled figures of the great religions. BUT, because of my prior stated interactions with ‘the Holy’, I knew that I had some status of communication with ‘the Omniscient’.

Flash-forward sixteen to seventeen years, after other seeming minor interventions on my behalf with other people, I was in Corpus Christi Texas, by design by my intrigued fascination to be living in ‘the body of Christ’, aka Corpus Christi. I, unsolicitedly, had contacted an old flame by letter to remind her of my feelings for her had not waned over the years. I was hoping to renew and revive the relationship. She responded most negatively to my presumptuous assumptions about her and us. I was quite chagrined and crestfallen by her letter, and I went to bed in stoic resignation to this dismissal of my hopes. I had a dream that night of me being in a wooded glen sitting on a log, when an angel (whose face was of a person I knew [who was and is alive]). The angel asked me, “How ya doin’?”. I shrugged my shoulders and said, “I’m OK.” The ‘Angel’ looked at me incredulously and said, “You Men! Always trying to be brave!”. With that she kissed me on the cheek with much affection; the dream ended there. I awoke thinking “How resilient the mind is to be able to produce such a compensatory narrative for my mental morale!”. Ahhhhhh.. this tale had not been fully revealed! Thinking that a wake of a coworkers’ family member was that afternoon, I went to the designated funeral home where I expected to pay my respects and give my condolences to the family. But I didn’t see any familiar faces there. Not my co-worker, or anyone else from my job. I then perused the brochure I had mechanically picked up at the entrance to the sanctuary. I looked all between the covers, and finally closed the brochure and saw the front cover picture. It was the setting of my dream from the night before from the painting of Jesus with the comforting Angel  20170408_120709_resized.jpg! I realized that, like the other times in the past I was being given a message by signals of a ‘Presence’ which was connected to my psyche for reasons I still seek to understand.

It is this individual, concurrent signalling, which has continued since these incidents, that makes me testify, assert, and declare that WHO-ever or WHATever is that omniscient and omnipotent entity; IT does not need any literal iteration to get ITs point of ITs intention and will across to us-[extensions of IT]. With that, the Time’s expressions of equity (of accounting balances) for all  the qualities’ dynamics IS the LIVING Testament of this LOGOS. We ignore this phenomena only by our hubris and arrogance of ourselves and our narrow provincial interests, than taking into consideration the persistent signals given us through ITS medium of immutably, ever-changing creation.

Saturday, September 2, 2017

Fetished Icons & Idols of Carnality





Fetished Icons & Idols of Carnality
(Back to WE as the interactive phenomena with our subject)

As was said in the Gospels,
"Luke 21:30-32New King James Version (NKJV) 30 When they are already budding, you see and know for yourselves that summer is now near. 31 So you also, when you see these things happening, know that the kingdom of God is near. 32 Assuredly, I say to you, this generation will by no means pass away till all things take place."

They seek contemporaneous signs and symbols as validation, when all along it is the very interaction of our decisional ethics of what is just and equitable that is the overlooked intangible entity of our existence. It will not be Him or Her; or They or Them. It won't be a series or single event. IT will be the nature of one's ethical logic that will be the forger of the ‘Fetished Icons & Idols of Carnality’

By accepting some form of humanistic sensibilities as the conceivable boundaries, people reduce their behavior to its rhetorical justification in that myopic self-definition, neglecting to exclusion many signals of things beyond the atmospherics of their carnality, based on the extrapolated memes of current, mythical, and legendary icons and idols. And this is done to an extent which gives a consensual mass sacredness and deification rationale to those fetishistic beliefs and behaviors to delusional narratives.
There is just the choice of ethical or moral, imperative logic to an imminent or  impending phenomena or an elective whim. What we like or desire is subordinate to the few required imperatives of incidental course. The amount of focus given to either is the determinant between fanciful fabrications of unneeded superfluousness to groundedness on the connected elemental that is inclusive of the serendipitous holisms of insights from the logoses of the collective planes of being.

Those logoses give contextual depth to the contemporaneous matter of our cognitive perceptions in our humanistic, architectural  matrix. That context transports our identities from pawns of historical narratives and fictions towards the revelation of our transponder nature as data disseminators of feedback to the collective Logos of eternity, as our neural apparatus communicates across dimensions of random locales and timeless visitations. In doing this we are liberated from the perceived zero-sum games of carnality to the limitless boundaries of potentiality, where we are not confined to limited options of identity or being.